Home of the International Auxiliary Language.
Archive for the ‘international communication’ Category.
After much discussion and dealing and wheeling, One World, One Voice has made a decision.
Drum roll please…
The winning auxiliary language IS…
INTERLINGUA
OWOV has decided to throw its weight behind Interlingua, as the best possible compromise. From now on, everything we do will benefit the promotion of Interlingua as the auxiliary language of choice.
Thank you.
Copyright © 2007 OneWorldOneVoiceProject.org
Admittedly, we haven’t heard anything from the Ido and Interlingua leadership yet. But, there have been some dealing and wheeling behind the scenes.
Something’s brewing and we think that it is for the better.
So, check back often, because this site is about to change. 
Copyright © 2007 OneWorldOneVoiceProject.org
We are officially inviting the Ido and Interlingua organizations and their members, so we can start the process of deciding which of the two languages would be the best compromise, or be the most acceptable to the masses.
Also, if there are issues with the particular language that need to be worked out (such as deciding on the particles, in Interlingua) we need to finalize those as well, so we can move forward with promotion and marketing, as well as generating materials, like learning tools, literary works, audio programs and music, video programs, etc.
Obviously, all other groups and interested parties are welcome.
Copyright © 2007 OneWorldOneVoiceProject.org
As always, much is being made about the fact that our project arrived at Ido and Interlingua as a proposed auxiliary langauge, and not something else.
People are having intense discussions about this, and some even stated that they refuse to join One World, One Voice for the simple fact that they like another language.
These people are missing the point. Continue reading ‘Why Ido and Interlingua, and Why Not Some Other Language?’ »
I have been reading some of the discussion that’s going on about “One World, One Voice” in usegroups like “auxlang”.
Evidently, people are curious as to how we arrived at our “subjective criteria” and they are offering their own opinions on the matter.
Well, once again we have to use Esperanto as an example.
If you ask someone who is not involved with Esperanto (or do some serious searching on the internet, or show an Esperanto text or audio recording to a random group of people) you’ll find that most of them are not all that enthusiastic about it. They say it sounds weird, or that it sounds harsh, or that it doesn’t sound pleasant, or… or… or. Continue reading ‘What is Subjective?’ »